Shockingly (not really), failure to expand Medicaid continues to cost poor
Texans access to health insurance.
The Baker Institute at Rice University the Episcopal Health
Foundation have released their latest issue brief on the latest results
of the Health Reform Monitoring Survey, a quarterly survey which tracks the
effects of the Affordable Care Act on individuals. The Institute and the Foundation implement the survey for Texas.
This report contains absolutely no surprises for anyone with
more than three functioning brain cells and who hasn’t been living under a rock
for the last five years.
First, the good news: The percentage of uninsured
working-age adults (ages 18-64) estimated by the survey declined by nearly one
third, from nearly 25 percent to 17 percent between September 2013 and March
2015. Most encouragingly, Hispanics – though still the higher proportion of
uninsured in Texas – had the largest decline, with a drop of 38 percent.
This indicates that the health exchange model, supported by
federal subsidies, is helping a large number of uninsured individuals get
coverage.
The bad news of course, is that poor people who fall into “Medicaid
gap” – those who earn income less than 100 percent of the poverty line
necessary to obtain subsidies on the exchange, but higher than current Texas
cutoffs for Medicaid -- are still left out in the cold. The memo notes that respondents under 138
percent of the poverty line have increased from roughly 63 percent to 67 percent
of those uninsured in Texas. This change in the two surveys isn’t statistically
distinct from zero, but almost surely understates the impact of the state’s
failure to expand Medicaid, because individuals between 100-138 percent of the
poverty line qualify for subsidies.
Two other nuggets in the report are of interest. First, the potential tax penalty for health
insurance, also known as the individual mandate -- appears to have some effect
on driving the uninsured to seek insurance. More than half (53 percent) of
uninsured respondents say that the prospect of a fine for not purchasing
insurance is “somewhat” or “very” important to them. (Note that the IRS is
waiving the fine for households that fall into the “Medicaid gap.”
Finally, uninsured respondents overwhelming say that they
can’t purchase insurance because they can’t afford it (57 percent) instead of
because they don’t want it (17 percent). That’s useful because it undermines
(again) the talking point that uninsured people are satisfied in their current
state and that the government should just butt out.
To sum up then: Texans generally want health insurance, the
ACA is effective in helping them get insurance, and the ACA would help a lot
more Texans get insurance if the state were to expand Medicaid. Absolutely all
these things were predicted by proponents of Obamacare.
No comments:
Post a Comment